Do FDA is Sufficiently Protecting the Food Supply in the United States

QUESTION

In 2013, the FDA set limits for arsenic in apple juice. In 2016, the FDA proposed a limit for arsenic in infant rice cereal. Consider the toxicological effects of arsenic on the body. Do you think foods containing arsenic are a major concern? Reflect on if you would be concerned about consuming these foods or feeding them to a child. Do you think the FDA is sufficiently protecting the food supply in the United States from arsenic concerns? Why, or why not?

Your journal entry must be at least 200 words. No references or citations are necessary.

ANSWER

The FDA effectively screens the dimensions of these metals because at abnormal states they can be poisonous and present an exceptional peril to the individuals who are the most powerless: our youngsters. A year ago, the office set up a workgroup of sanitation specialists to help shape what FDA will do to shield buyers of any age from these metals when present in sustenances. Having toxic items like arsenic in the food we consume is always a matter of concern.  I would always try to avoid consuming such foods or give them to children. Arsenic harming can cause significant wellbeing intricacies and demise on the off chance that it isn’t dealt with, so insurances exist to ensure the individuals who are in danger. Considering the harmful effects of arsenic stricter regulations need to be in place to control its usage and level in different kinds of food items. As a normally happening component, it is beyond the realm of imagination to expect to expel arsenic from the earth or sustenance supply. The FDA, in this way, looks to constrain customer introduction to arsenic to the best degree attainable. Considering the current situation, the FDA is doing their best, but more research is needed to develop advanced protection against arsenic.